What makes a good SRC application?
1. The question being addressed is clear and is of strategic relevance to the Trust.
2. The lead PI has an excellent track record and has the ability to manage multi-investigator led research programmes.
3. The best possible multidisciplinary team has been assembled, from different institutions, nationally and internationally
4. The anticipated outcomes, and the benefits these will bring to people with CF, are clear.
5. There are clear training opportunities for the young career scientists employed on the grant.
6. As detailed in our research strategy, funding by the Trust for research needs to demonstrate attention to the SCORE principles.
Additional factors that will be considered are:
1. A plan for longer term sustainability following the end of the grant
2. Whether the SRC brings additional (non-Cystic Fibrosis Trust funded) resources to the centre.
What are the SCORE principles?
- Strategic: demonstrate exceptional relevance to one or more strategic priority.
- Collaborative: demonstrate the clear added-value of bringing a group of researchers together to tackle a major concern in cystic fibrosis.
- Outcome-focused: demonstrate a clear understanding of the potential impact of the programme of work on cystic fibrosis outcomes.
- Risk-based: we plan to manage a balanced research portfolio of varying risks: high risk vs lower risk and basic vs applied sciences.
- Excellence-driven: scientifically excellent and conducted by an internationally leading research team